what isn't granny-ish about it?
it's big, i mean HUGE. plenty of room to move around. perhaps too much in my opinion. although i do must say i enjoy the leg room. then again i'm typically squeezed in the back of a Golf or Focus. i guess thats what the old people like, the ability to get in and out without any problems.
oh, and i think they may perhaps like the leather too.
did you know that they also have lumbar support? seriously...i honestly dont even know what in the hell that is except that on the airplanes, in business class, they have lumbar support too and if you turn it on you get a lovely back massage.
what i didn't know about this automobile though is that it caters to fat people. yes, you heard me right...fat people.
why would i say that? well, i got to sit up front yesterday. and do you know what i saw?
2 SEATBELT LOCKS!!!!
i kid you not...one is like the ones in your average car that are directly attached to the seat or next to the seat via a little bar. now, this 2nd seat belt lock isn't wedged in the leather like the first one but lays around attached to seat belt material approximately 8 inches long. imagine an extender.
seriously, i never even considered a grand marquis as a possible big person car. i guess i can understand it though.
although the front is 2 seats, they were so wide it could technically be considered a bench. the backs were completely straight across so it wasn't confining you like a chair.
in my focus, the seats are more sports car-ish so if your wider, you feel the sides of the chair attacking you. i know when i was in the 190's, it was uncomfortabley for me to sit in at times.
i know its a tough time for automakers, and since everyone else is widening their seats (except perhaps for the airline industry) should the car makers automatically put in an extender seatbelt lock?
i don't want to say that fat people shouldn't be driving, but isn't it a hazard at that point? are the people that need the extenders, the same people that need to be carted around in a wheel chair in the airport?
or is it better that more options, safer options are available to the larger consumer?
or is it only adding to the obesity problem by aknowledging the need and therefore supplying the demand?